Dennis, I think Martin means 1" either side as you can not pass within 1" of another enemy unit unless charging. Hence why Martin put the base plus 2", referring to the total space that must be available to get the unit through, a base at a time.

Bob, I recall something that Martin said that the enemy unit to the one that has disengaged, can not move in the same turn that the disengagement took place. Basically they sit there not sure what has just happened, and therefore need time to adjust to the fact the enemy has pulled back. But I would...

No problem, I have to keep going over the rules as there are bits I always forget and get mixed up with other rule sets. I blame old age lol.

I have not come across this rotating rule, the only time you can do anything like that is by moving within the arc and as you say you reduce your movement by 25%. What page in the rule book does it make reference to rotating a unit after it has gone straight forward?
Mike

Best not to think about cavalry and elephants in your example, as cavalry can not charge elephants anyway. I think in your example, but put a formed infantry unit in place of the elephant, if the skirmishers end up being charged, and do not evade enough they will be destroyed in the combat phase. Yo...

Hi Bill,

Martin will correct me if I am wrong, but you use the modified result as the deduction, so in your example above both units test against their cohesion less 4.

Mike

Hi Wayne, I will be attending. Mike

Wayne, I will be teaming up with Dave M from our club once he books his place. Mike

Hi Bob, I think from memory chariots are treated like cavalry, and that excess wounds are NOT carried over. Elephants are a special case. Chariots are a normal unit, and the normal unit rules apply - again I am sure Martin will correct me and I will check the rules tonight.

Just purchased my ticket, only 15 places left and selling fast. lol.